Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
  • The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF document file format.
  • Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
  • The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
  • The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.

Copyright Notice

Taxable Income An article Published in the journal, the author(s) Is:

  • given to the journal licensed under a Creative Commons License Attribution that allows others to share the work with the consent of the work's authorship.
  • Allowed online
  • continues to be the copyright owner and allows the journal to publish the article under a CC BY-NC-ND license
  • Receive a DOI (Digital Object Identifier) of the work.

Reviewers

 

 

Screening Plagiarism

Plagiarism Screening Policy

  • The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works. If the author(s) use other's works and/or words then they must be cited or quoted appropriately.
  • An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.
  • Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
  • All received manuscripts will go through a plagiarism screening process by the editorial board. Medika Cendikia Editors use  Turnitin for submission.
  • Articles submitted must have a maximum of 20% difference in similarities.

Archiving Information

All articles published in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA)  will be archived / preserved by utilizing the archiving feature from "PKP Preservation Network" developed by the "Public Knowledge Project" in the form of a digital journal preservation network from the OJS (Open Journal System) platform, the feature offers decentralized and distributed preservation, seamless access, and preservation of the original version of the article. more information

Article Complaint Process

Author Complaint Process

Author Complaint Process

Before submitting manuscripts, authors are requested to read all the guidelines and policies regarding the processing and publication of the manuscript here.

How to complain?

The authors have the right to complain and ask explanation if they perceive any misconduct in any applicable policies and ethical guidelines. The authors can raise their complaints by submitting a letter to email editor@sdgsreview.org

Complaints categorization

An author or any other scholar may submit their complaints about any issues related to:

  • Plagiarism
  • Copyright violation.
  • Deceiving in research results or wrong research results.
  • Violations in the set standard for research.
  • Unrevealed conflicts of interest.
  • Bias in the review process.
  • Manuscript processing time is unusually late.
  • The peer-review comments are unsatisfactory.
  • Authorship issues.

Policy for Dealing with Complaints

Once a complaint is received, at first, an acknowledgment is sent to the complainant with the assurance that appropriate action will be taken on the complaint within three working days excluding the complaint receiving date.

The investigation process is initiated by the Journal handling team according to the directions of the Editor-In-Chief. After the investigation is over, a meeting is held with a complete report on the complaint. The decision is taken in and the same is forwarded to the concerned scholar through his submitted email ID.

We consider complaints as an opportunity to enhance our existing Manuscript Processing System. All the received complaints are dealt with in a polite and timely manner with certainty.

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.