Faktor Sosiodemografi dan  Self Efficacy Penderita Diabetes Mellitus Tipe 2 (Study pada Peserta Prolanis) di Puskesmas Talaga Bodas Bandung

Salami Salami

doi:10.33482/medika.v4i01.64

Salami Salami STIKes Aisyiyah Bandung

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33482/medika.v4i01.64

Keywords: Sociodemographic, self efficacy, corelation, self care management

Abstract

In Indonesia the number of patients with DM Type 2 disease is increasing, based on Blueprint for Change report released in September 2013 it is known that the number of DM patients amounted to 7.6 million people. The number of DM patients in Indonesia rose from rank 9 to rank 7 countries in the world. The number of DM patients receiving treatment was only 39 percent, and only 0.7 percent achieved treatment targets. The success of treatment is influenced by various factors such as self efficacy. Self efficacy is one of the important factors in the management of type 2 diabetes. High self efficacy is related to the improvement of glycemic control, medication compliance and self management. The sociodemographic factor is an important factor that must be known to encourage a person to behave in a belief in controlling his illness. This study aims to determine the relationship between sociodemographic factors with self efficacy of type 2 diabetes mellitus. This type of research is descriptive correlation with cross sectional approach. The number of samples used is simple random sampling as much as 40 respondents of prolanis participants at Talaga Bodas Health Center Bandung by using questionnaires Diabetes Self-Efficacy Questionnare (DSEQ). Based on bivariate analysis, there was no correlation between age, sex, occupation and income ( significant between education, duration of illness with self efficacy (p <0,05) relation between age and self efficacy (p value = 0,224). Gender variable, it is known that women have good self efficacy that is equal to 91,6% while efficacy less 8,4% Based on bivariate analysis there is no relationship between sex with self efficacy (p value = 0,102) Similarly, job = 0,916) and income (p value = 0,132), and history of care (p value 0,132), whereas based on educational level and length of DM disease there is correlation with (p value = 0,003) and (p value = 0,001).

References

American Diabetes Association (ADA). (2015). Diabetes Guildlines Summary Recommendations from NDEI. Ashifield Healthcare Communication, ndei.org, Maret : 1-41.

Ariani, Yesi; Sitorus, Ratna dan Gayatri, Dewi. (2012). Motivasi dan Efikasi Diri Pasien Diabetes Mellitus Tipe 2 dalam Asuhan Keperawatan. Jurnal Keperawatan Indonesia. Volume 15 No. 1, Maret : 29-38.

Chlebowy OD, Myers J. (2010). Socio Demografic Variable and Self Efficacy in Caucasian and American Adults With Type 2 Diabetes. Southtern Jurnal Online f Nursing Volume 10 Number 4

Corwin, Elizabeth J. (2009). Buku Saku Patofisiologi edisi 3. EGC, Jakarta.

Dahlan, Sopiyudin. (2010). Besar Sampel dan Cara Pengambilan Sampel dalam Penelitian Kedokteran dan Kesehatan. Salemba Medika, Jakarta.

Dinas Kesehatan (DINKES) Kota Bandung. (2014). Seksi Evaluasi Program Kesehatan. Bandung.

Gao J, Wang J, Zeng P, Haardorfer R, Kegler CM, Zhu Y, Fu Hua. (2013). Effects of Self- Care, Self-Efficacy, Social Support on Glycemic Control in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes BMC Family Practice

Hasanat, Nida UI, (2015). Manajemen Diabetes Analisis Kuantitatif Faktor-Faktor Psikososial Pada Pasien Diabetes Melitus Tipe II. Disertasi. Program Doktor Psikologi Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta.

Halgin, Richard P. (2010). Psikologi Abnormal : Perspektif Klinis pada Gangguan Psikologis. Salemba Medika, Jakarta.

Kusuma, Henni dan Hidayati, Wahyu. (2013). Hubungan Antara Motivasi dengan Efikasi Diri Pada Pasien DM Tipe 2 di Persadia Salatiga. Jurnal Keperawatan Medikal Bedah. Vol 1 No. 2, November: 132-141.

Laporan Bulanan 1 (LB1) UPT Puskesmas Talaga Bodas. (2015). Bandung.

Perhimpunan Endokrinologi Indonesia (PERKENI); BPJS Kesehatan, (2011). Panduan Klinis Prolanis DM Tipe 2. BPJS Kesehatan: Jakarta.

Pertiwi, Intan. (2015). Hubungan Dukungan Pasangan dan Efikasi Diri dengan Kepatuhan Menjalani Pengobatan Pada Penderita Diabetes Mellitus Tipe II. Skripsi. Program Sarjana Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. Surakarta.

Pusat Data dan Informasi kementrian Kesehatan RI (InfoDATIN). (2014). Situasi dan Analisis Diabetes. Kementrian Kesehatan RI tahun 2014. Jakarta

Profil Prolanis UPT Puskesmas Talaga Bodas. (2016). Bandung.

Riduwan, (2010). Belajar Mudah Penelitian untuk Guru-Karyawan dan Peneliti Pemula. Bandung : Alfabeta.

Roblin, Nancy; Little, Margaret dan McGuire, Helen. (2004). Diabetes Self-Efficacy Questionnare (DSEQ). Outcome Measurement For Diabetes Education. Canada : Queen’s University.

Wallston K, Rothman R, Cherrington A. Psychometric Properties of the Perceived Diabetes Self-Management Scale (PDSMS).J Behav Med. 2007;30:395–401.

Walker JR, Smalls LB, Tejada, AM, Campbell Aj, Egede EL. Effect of Diabetes Self Efficacy on Glicemic Control, Medication Adherence And quality of Life Iin A PreDominantly Low Income, Minority Population.Ethnicity & Disease, Vol 24, Summer 2014

Wen LK, Shepherd MD, Parchman ML. Family support, diet, and exesice among older Mexican Americans with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Edue. 2004;30:980–93.

Wu, S.F.V (2007). Effectiveness of self management for person with type 2diabetes following the implementation of a self-efficacy enhancingintervention program in Taiwan. Queensland: Queensland University of Technology.